Posted on: February 20, 2008 12:13 pm

Should the Gasol trade be vetoed?

Let me start by saying that the Lakers got a great deal. But, I think the media is overemphasizing how bad the deal was for Memphis. I don't think this deal rises to the point where a committee should be appointed to veto trades like this. Several coaches/GM's around the league are advocating such a committee.

Memphis wanted to free up cap space to rebuild. There are few, if any, expiring contracts for horrible players as large as Kwame Brown's. That frees up a ton of space and allows Memphis to pursue free agents (whether they land any is another ?).

Memphis also got Crittenton who was a 1st round pick with some potential.

They also get 2 1st round picks in 2008 and 2010 to help the rebuilding process.

Plus, Memphis really believes Pau's brother, Marc Gasol will be good. The guy was MVP of the Spanish League.  I doubt he will be as good as Pau, but he might be a serviceable NBA player.

Combine the cap space, draft picks, young PG, and overseas project with potential and I think Memphis got some value in return.  Again, they got the worst end of the deal. But, I don't think its so bad that committee's should be established to veto trades like this.

What are your thoughts?

Posted on: February 20, 2008 12:06 pm
This entry has been removed by the administrator.

Post Deleted by Administrator

This message has been removed by the administrator.

The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author and do not reflect the views of CBS Sports or CBSSports.com